N. Baratte - TechStock01

N. Baratte - TechStock01

Share this post

N. Baratte - TechStock01
N. Baratte - TechStock01
TSMC 2Q25: a number of very positive messages, plus a major contradiction on 4Q25 revenue

TSMC 2Q25: a number of very positive messages, plus a major contradiction on 4Q25 revenue

Nicolas Baratte - TechStock01's avatar
Nicolas Baratte - TechStock01
Jul 17, 2025
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

N. Baratte - TechStock01
N. Baratte - TechStock01
TSMC 2Q25: a number of very positive messages, plus a major contradiction on 4Q25 revenue
1
Share
  • NT$ appreciation has a very large impact on revenue / margins but TSMC beats consensus in 2Q, 3Q guidance is in-line. FX impact is large, but other factors (higher utilization, cost control) partially neutralize it.

  • This will be controversial: management increase 2025 US$-revenue growth from mid-20 to 30%. Yet, this implies that 4Q25 US$-revenue growth will collapse (2Q 44% YoY, 3Q 37%, 4Q 9%) and NT$-revenue growth will be negative in 4Q (chart below). Do I believe this?

  • At the same time, mngt gives a long list of very positive messages on AI demand, N2 ramp, full utilization of EUV nodes. My take: TSMC had to increase 2025 guidance, but they do their “very conservative” thing. This could lead to a little bit of stock price weakness.

N. Baratte - TechStock01 is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Comments on the contradiction between 2025 revenue guidance and the very bullish management’s statements

We know 1-2Q25. We have an official guidance for 3Q (US$-revenue $32.4bn) and for 2025 (30% YoY US$ growth). So we can calculate 4Q. The only assumption below (chart and table below) is FX 1US = 29NT, same as 3Q guidance.

This is what “30% YoY US$-revenue growth” implies: a very large decline in growth in 4Q.

At the same time, management gives very bullish statements:

  • “AI demand is very strong. Haven’t seen this kind of demand for a long time.

  • 7nm and below capacity is very tight.

  • Our capacity is very very tight. Cycle time is 4 months. There is no way you can pull in anything.

  • TSMC is working hard to close the gap between supply / demand. Unprecedented capacity expansion”

What can we conclude:

  • TSMC management is being its usual very conservative self – remember for ex:

    • TSMC gives a “53% and above” gross margin target when they deliver 58%. Then management stress “and above”. But they won’t commit to more than 53%.

    • 3 months ago, revenue guidance was “close to mid-20% YoY” and now its 30%. Given 4-5 month production time, plus 6 months firm orders, management definitely knew 3 months back that growth was 30%. But they maintained a low guidance.

  • Capacity is full, capacity addition is at its max and growth will indeed slowdown a lot in 4Q: no room to make more wafers. That’s possible but in that case, revenue should not decline QoQ in 4Q (table above).

  • Capacity is full, TSMC is “working very hard to close the gap between supply / demand” does not contradict a very positive demand outlook.

  • How do we get to 4Q revenue flat QoQ? with 2025 US$-revenue growth at 33.5%. Table below. That looks like a worst case scenario.

Share

What you’re missing below the paywall:

  • 2Q25: large negative FX impact, yet TSMC beats Consensus

  • 3Q25: large negative FX impact to continue, more visible on margins, yet TSMC guidance is in-line with Consensus

  • Mechanics of NT$ appreciation

  • Outlook for N2 is very strong

  • TSMC GigaFab management

  • Reiteration of the dilutive impact of overseas fabs

  • Consensus expectations, valuations

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Nicolas Baratte
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share